Commentary correction

 

 

 Commentary correction

preliminary remarks

This passage from section 2 introduces several important points : The mysterious origin of Lennie, George's frustration, Candy's presentation, and the aftermath (consequence) of the interview with the boss.

1. How is characterization exemplified here ?

Lennie + George = conflict. Solved mostly through dialogues. 

Candy + old dog = Candy. They are consubstantial. 

2. Is tragedy used here ?

George = shooting, hell x 2. Tempts Destiny / predestination. Lennie as cards reader (very good questions = Sphynx + Oedipus), asking the three question : where I come from ? Who am I ? (and in section 3, Where am I going ?). Oedipus thinks he's mastered the riddle (enigma), but he's yet to learn about his real past, self and future, just like George. Fear + awe (Artistotle).

Candy = will lose the dog. Anticipation : we don't have Carlson's reaction to the dog first, but its relationship with the old man.

Unity = place, time and action.

3. Writing as a conflict between innocence and experience

characters are the ones who name one another, in a collaboration with the author / demiurge. 

American, yet universal = language of the characters (US), strict writing rules millenia old (universal)

paradox = characters should not talk, should not share secrets, should be on their own. How can we have a novel if no one speaks?

Novels as documentaries on their own writing.