Commentary correction
Commentary correction preliminary remarks This passage from section 2 introduces several important points : The mysterious origin of Lennie, George's frustration, Candy's presentation, and the aftermath ( consequence ) of the interview with the boss. 1. How is characterization exemplified here ? Lennie + George = conflict. Solved mostly through dialogues . Candy + old dog = Candy. They are consubstantial. 2. Is tragedy used here ? George = shooting, hell x 2. Tempts Destiny / predestination. Lennie as cards reader (very good questions = Sphynx + Oedipus), asking the three question : where I come from ? Who am I ? (and in section 3, Where am I going ?). Oedipus thinks he's mastered the riddle (enigma), but he's yet to learn about his real past, self and future, just like George. Fear + awe (Artistotle). Candy = will lose the dog. Anticipation : we don't have Carlson's reaction to the dog first, but its relationship with the old man. Unity = plac...